Which type of chiropractor would be most likely to write a definition of subluxation that includes the phrase 'interference with the transmission of innate intelligence from the brain to the tissues of the body'?

Which type of chiropractor would be most likely to write a definition of subluxation that includes the phrase 'interference with the transmission of innate intelligence from the brain to the tissues of the body'?

• A. Mixer
• B. Ultra liberal
• C. Moderate
• D. Ultra conservative

Answer: (B)

The phrase points to a traditional, vitalistic view of subluxation, where health is guided by an Innate Intelligence and any blockage in the transmission from brain to body tissues is seen as interference with that intelligence. This kind of definition reflects a dogmatic, philosophy-driven stance that treats subluxation as a metaphysical mechanism rather than a purely biomechanical issue. In this framework, the chiropractor emphasizes innate regulation and the nervous system as the central pathway controlling health, so wording like “innate intelligence” and interference with its transmission is exactly what one would expect. Among practice styles, this aligns with the ultra conservative end of the spectrum, which clings to classic subluxation language and vitalistic concepts rather than adopting a strictly evidence-based or eclectic approach. Mixers or moderates would be less likely to frame subluxation in such metaphysical terms, and ultra liberal approaches tend to adopt broader, less dogmatic language about health and nervous-system function.

The phrase points to a traditional, vitalistic view of subluxation, where health is guided by an Innate Intelligence and any blockage in the transmission from brain to body tissues is seen as interference with that intelligence. This kind of definition reflects a dogmatic, philosophy-driven stance that treats subluxation as a metaphysical mechanism rather than a purely biomechanical issue. In this framework, the chiropractor emphasizes innate regulation and the nervous system as the central pathway controlling health, so wording like “innate intelligence” and interference with its transmission is exactly what one would expect. Among practice styles, this aligns with the ultra conservative end of the spectrum, which clings to classic subluxation language and vitalistic concepts rather than adopting a strictly evidence-based or eclectic approach. Mixers or moderates would be less likely to frame subluxation in such metaphysical terms, and ultra liberal approaches tend to adopt broader, less dogmatic language about health and nervous-system function.