Dr. DD Palmer theorized that the subluxation would

Dr. DD Palmer theorized that the subluxation would

• A. Facilitate but not inhibit nerve conduction
• B. Neither facilitate nor inhibit nerve conduction
• C. Both facilitate and inhibit nerve conduction
• D. Inhibit but not facilitate nerve conduction

Answer: (C)

In Palmer’s view, a vertebral subluxation disturbs the normal flow of nerve impulses, and that disturbance isn’t limited to one direction. The misalignment can irritate and mechanically affect the nerve, which may increase nerve firing in some situations (facilitation) or reduce or block transmission in others (inhibition). Because the same structural disruption can have different effects depending on the exact location, severity, and surrounding tissues, the subluxation is understood as capable of both facilitating and inhibiting nerve conduction. This bidirectional impact explains why the best description is that the subluxation can do both. The other statements imply a single-direction effect or no effect at all, which doesn’t align with the idea of nerve interference being variable and bidirectional in Palmer’s theory.

In Palmer’s view, a vertebral subluxation disturbs the normal flow of nerve impulses, and that disturbance isn’t limited to one direction. The misalignment can irritate and mechanically affect the nerve, which may increase nerve firing in some situations (facilitation) or reduce or block transmission in others (inhibition). Because the same structural disruption can have different effects depending on the exact location, severity, and surrounding tissues, the subluxation is understood as capable of both facilitating and inhibiting nerve conduction. This bidirectional impact explains why the best description is that the subluxation can do both. The other statements imply a single-direction effect or no effect at all, which doesn’t align with the idea of nerve interference being variable and bidirectional in Palmer’s theory.